CGGO vs QTEC: Holdings Overlap
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
First Trust · 45 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGGO: 2026-05-31, QTEC: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGO and QTEC?
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104 positions; First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC, by First Trust) holds 45. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 16.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 16.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13CGGO holds 104 · QTEC holds 45
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGO 24%·QTEC 28%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGO
91 of 104 positions (74.6% of the fund) are not held by QTEC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in QTEC
32 of 45 positions (72.2% of the fund) are not held by CGGO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGO | QTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.1% | 86.5% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 2.2% |
| Financials | 10.4% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.3% | 4.7% |
| Health Care | 8.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 16.0% | 6.5% |
| Unclassified | 3.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of CGGO, 0% of QTEC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
| QTEC | +1.7% | +37.5% | +49.6% | +28.1% | +14.1% | +21.4% | 0.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGO vs QTEC →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 91% of the overlap, led by AVGO, WDC and MSFT.
3.70% | 2.31% | 2.31% | |
2.45% | 2.14% | 2.14% | |
2.04% | 2.24% | 2.04% | |
5.69% | 1.85% | 1.85% | |
1.39% | 2.34% | 1.39% | |
1.37% | 2.23% | 1.37% | |
3.02% | 1.11% | 1.11% | |
0.98% | 2.33% | 0.98% | |
0.81% | 2.08% | 0.81% | |
0.75% | 2.37% | 0.75% | |
0.55% | 2.21% | 0.55% | |
0.53% | 2.35% | 0.53% | |
0.32% | 2.27% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGO and QTEC overlap?
CGGO and QTEC overlap by 16.1% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (CGGO holds 104 positions and QTEC holds 45), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGO and QTEC?
The two portfolios are 16.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGO and QTEC?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, WDC, MSFT, MU and NVDA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 91% of the total overlap.
What does CGGO own that QTEC doesn't?
91 positions (74.6% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO, led by TSM, 000660 and 005930. In the other direction, 32 positions (72.2% of QTEC) are unique to QTEC.