CGGO vs RSPT: Holdings Overlap
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Invesco · 73 holdings · $5.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CGGO: 2026-05-31, RSPT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGO and RSPT?
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT, by Invesco) holds 73. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 13.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 13.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14CGGO holds 104 · RSPT holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGO 21%·RSPT 21%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGO
90 of 104 positions (77.1% of the fund) are not held by RSPT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGO | RSPT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 39.1% | 98.7% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 10.4% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.3% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 8.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 16.0% | 1.2% |
| Unclassified | 3.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (3% of CGGO, 0% of RSPT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
| RSPT | +5.6% | +42.3% | +59.3% | +30.5% | +17.0% | +21.3% | 0.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGO vs RSPT →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the overlap, led by WDC, MU and AVGO.
2.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% | |
5.69% | 1.47% | 1.47% | |
3.70% | 1.45% | 1.45% | |
1.39% | 1.28% | 1.28% | |
2.04% | 1.20% | 1.20% | |
0.98% | 2.34% | 0.98% | |
0.81% | 1.15% | 0.81% | |
0.75% | 1.85% | 0.75% | |
0.75% | 1.24% | 0.75% | |
0.63% | 1.48% | 0.63% | |
0.56% | 0.95% | 0.56% | |
0.55% | 2.08% | 0.55% | |
0.46% | 1.60% | 0.46% | |
0.32% | 1.43% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGO and RSPT overlap?
CGGO and RSPT overlap by 13.1% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (CGGO holds 104 positions and RSPT holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGO and RSPT?
The two portfolios are 13.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGO and RSPT?
The largest positions held by both funds are WDC, MU, AVGO, NVDA and MSFT. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the total overlap.
What does CGGO own that RSPT doesn't?
90 positions (77.1% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO, led by TSM, 000660 and GOOGL. In the other direction, 59 positions (78.4% of RSPT) are unique to RSPT.