CGGR vs IWF: Holdings Overlap
Capital Group · 88 holdings · $23.9B · as of 2026-05-31
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
iShares · 387 holdings · $127.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGGR: 2026-05-31, IWF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGR and IWF?
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR, by Capital Group) holds 88 positions; iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF, by iShares) holds 387. They have 52 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 45.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 45.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 52CGGR holds 88 · IWF holds 387
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGR 73%·IWF 74%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGR
36 of 88 positions (24.7% of the fund) are not held by IWF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWF
335 of 387 positions (26.3% of the fund) are not held by CGGR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGR | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 36.0% | 49.2% |
| Communication Services | 17.0% | 12.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.9% | 13.1% |
| Health Care | 9.2% | 8.0% |
| Industrials | 7.9% | 6.7% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 10.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGR | +0.6% | +5.7% | +12.8% | +22.4% | — | — | 0.15% |
| IWF | +2.7% | +5.5% | +13.1% | +22.0% | +12.6% | +17.8% | 0.35% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGR vs IWF →
Shared Holdings(52)
The top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and MSFT.
5.16% | 12.92% | 5.16% | |
5.40% | 4.79% | 4.79% | |
4.37% | 8.82% | 4.37% | |
5.85% | 3.55% | 3.55% | |
7.09% | 3.46% | 3.46% | |
3.06% | 3.54% | 3.06% | |
3.36% | 2.87% | 2.87% | |
2.69% | 4.66% | 2.69% | |
2.34% | 1.84% | 1.84% | |
1.81% | 2.66% | 1.81% | |
1.79% | 11.64% | 1.79% | |
1.85% | 1.47% | 1.47% | |
1.11% | 1.06% | 1.06% | |
1.17% | 0.70% | 0.70% | |
0.60% | 1.60% | 0.60% | |
1.68% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
0.85% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
0.55% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.53% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.44% | 0.85% | 0.44% | |
1.56% | 0.41% | 0.41% | |
0.35% | 1.45% | 0.35% | |
0.57% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.76% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
1.65% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGR and IWF overlap?
CGGR and IWF overlap by 45.7% of portfolio weight. They share 52 holdings (CGGR holds 88 positions and IWF holds 387), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGR and IWF?
The two portfolios are 45.7% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGR and IWF?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, MSFT, TSLA and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 74% of the total overlap.
What does CGGR own that IWF doesn't?
36 positions (24.7% of CGGR) are unique to CGGR, led by MU, SHOP and 000660. In the other direction, 335 positions (26.3% of IWF) are unique to IWF.