CGGR vs MGK: Holdings Overlap
Capital Group · 88 holdings · $23.9B · as of 2026-05-31
MGKVanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
Vanguard · 59 holdings · $33.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGGR: 2026-05-31, MGK: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGR and MGK?
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR, by Capital Group) holds 88 positions; Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund (MGK, by Vanguard) holds 59. They have 22 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 44.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 44.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 22CGGR holds 88 · MGK holds 59
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGR 53%·MGK 78%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGR
66 of 88 positions (44.7% of the fund) are not held by MGK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MGK
37 of 59 positions (21.6% of the fund) are not held by CGGR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGR | MGK |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 36.0% | 54.4% |
| Communication Services | 17.0% | 16.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.9% | 13.1% |
| Health Care | 9.2% | 5.2% |
| Industrials | 7.9% | 3.0% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 7.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGR | +0.6% | +5.7% | +12.8% | +22.4% | — | — | 0.15% |
| MGK | +3.8% | +10.2% | +19.4% | +24.7% | +14.0% | +18.8% | 0.32% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGR vs MGK →
Shared Holdings(22)
The top 10 shared positions account for 78% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and MSFT.
5.16% | 13.75% | 5.16% | |
5.40% | 4.40% | 4.40% | |
4.37% | 9.01% | 4.37% | |
5.85% | 4.18% | 4.18% | |
7.09% | 4.17% | 4.17% | |
3.36% | 4.37% | 3.36% | |
3.06% | 5.51% | 3.06% | |
2.69% | 4.59% | 2.69% | |
2.34% | 1.97% | 1.97% | |
1.81% | 3.17% | 1.81% | |
1.79% | 12.60% | 1.79% | |
1.85% | 1.76% | 1.76% | |
1.17% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
1.68% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
0.85% | 0.80% | 0.80% | |
1.56% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.57% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.55% | 0.78% | 0.55% | |
0.89% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.50% | 0.74% | 0.50% | |
0.44% | 1.14% | 0.44% | |
0.35% | 1.72% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGR and MGK overlap?
CGGR and MGK overlap by 44.9% of portfolio weight. They share 22 holdings (CGGR holds 88 positions and MGK holds 59), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGR and MGK?
The two portfolios are 44.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGR and MGK?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, MSFT, TSLA and META. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 78% of the total overlap.
What does CGGR own that MGK doesn't?
66 positions (44.7% of CGGR) are unique to CGGR, led by MU, TDG and NET. In the other direction, 37 positions (21.6% of MGK) are unique to MGK.