CGGR vs QQEW: Holdings Overlap
Capital Group · 88 holdings · $23.9B · as of 2026-05-31
QQEWFirst Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF
First Trust · 51 holdings · $1.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGGR: 2026-05-31, QQEW: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGGR and QQEW?
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR, by Capital Group) holds 88 positions; First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW, by First Trust) holds 51. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18CGGR holds 88 · QQEW holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGR 45%·QQEW 34%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGR
70 of 88 positions (53.2% of the fund) are not held by QQEW. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in QQEW
33 of 51 positions (66.1% of the fund) are not held by CGGR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGR | QQEW |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 36.0% | 49.6% |
| Communication Services | 17.0% | 10.0% |
| Health Care | 9.2% | 16.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.9% | 12.4% |
| Industrials | 7.9% | 7.7% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 3.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGR | +0.6% | +5.7% | +12.8% | +22.4% | — | — | 0.15% |
| QQEW | +2.5% | +14.0% | +19.6% | +14.5% | +7.7% | +14.2% | 0.20% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGR vs QQEW →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and MSFT.
5.16% | 2.06% | 2.06% | |
5.40% | 2.03% | 2.03% | |
4.37% | 1.98% | 1.98% | |
7.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% | |
1.85% | 2.14% | 1.85% | |
1.79% | 2.09% | 1.79% | |
1.68% | 1.97% | 1.68% | |
4.86% | 1.63% | 1.63% | |
1.56% | 2.01% | 1.56% | |
1.17% | 2.01% | 1.17% | |
3.36% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
3.06% | 0.98% | 0.98% | |
0.83% | 2.05% | 0.83% | |
0.76% | 2.16% | 0.76% | |
0.57% | 1.84% | 0.57% | |
0.53% | 2.07% | 0.53% | |
0.50% | 1.96% | 0.50% | |
0.23% | 1.92% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGR and QQEW overlap?
CGGR and QQEW overlap by 23.1% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (CGGR holds 88 positions and QQEW holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGR and QQEW?
The two portfolios are 23.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGR and QQEW?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, MSFT, META and NFLX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does CGGR own that QQEW doesn't?
70 positions (53.2% of CGGR) are unique to CGGR, led by TSLA, AMZN and V. In the other direction, 33 positions (66.1% of QQEW) are unique to QQEW.