CGGR vs QQQM: Holdings Overlap
Capital Group · 88 holdings · $23.9B · as of 2026-05-31
Invesco · 101 holdings · $97.1B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are CGGR and QQQM?
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR, by Capital Group) holds 88 positions; Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 26 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 44.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 44.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 26CGGR holds 88 · QQQM holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGGR 59%·QQQM 59%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGGR
62 of 88 positions (39.1% of the fund) are not held by QQQM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGGR | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 36.0% | 57.8% |
| Communication Services | 17.0% | 14.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.9% | 11.4% |
| Health Care | 9.2% | 3.7% |
| Industrials | 7.9% | 3.2% |
| Other Sectors | 14.1% | 9.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGR | +0.6% | +5.7% | +12.8% | +22.4% | — | — | 0.15% |
| QQQM | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.7% | +25.3% | +15.2% | — | 0.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGGR vs QQQM →
Shared Holdings(26)
The top 10 shared positions account for 78% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MU and MSFT.
5.16% | 8.13% | 5.16% | |
4.86% | 4.78% | 4.78% | |
4.37% | 5.30% | 4.37% | |
5.85% | 3.45% | 3.45% | |
5.40% | 3.36% | 3.36% | |
3.36% | 3.24% | 3.24% | |
3.06% | 3.51% | 3.06% | |
7.09% | 2.96% | 2.96% | |
2.69% | 4.60% | 2.69% | |
1.79% | 7.26% | 1.79% | |
1.85% | 1.59% | 1.59% | |
1.19% | 2.51% | 1.19% | |
1.17% | 1.10% | 1.10% | |
1.68% | 0.66% | 0.66% | |
1.63% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
0.83% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
0.60% | 1.86% | 0.60% | |
0.57% | 0.82% | 0.57% | |
0.53% | 0.79% | 0.53% | |
1.56% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.35% | 0.46% | 0.35% | |
0.50% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.59% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.40% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
1.03% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGGR and QQQM overlap?
CGGR and QQQM overlap by 44.4% of portfolio weight. They share 26 holdings (CGGR holds 88 positions and QQQM holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGGR and QQQM?
The two portfolios are 44.4% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGGR and QQQM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MU, MSFT, TSLA and AVGO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 78% of the total overlap.
What does CGGR own that QQQM doesn't?
62 positions (39.1% of CGGR) are unique to CGGR, led by V, TDG and LLY. In the other direction, 75 positions (40.3% of QQQM) are unique to QQQM.