CGUS vs OEF: Holdings Overlap
CGUSCapital Group Core Equity ETF
Capital Group · 65 holdings · $11.6B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 101 holdings · $20.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGUS: 2026-05-31, OEF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGUS and OEF?
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS, by Capital Group) holds 65 positions; iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF, by iShares) holds 101. They have 35 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 49.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 49.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 35CGUS holds 65 · OEF holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGUS 68%·OEF 66%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGUS
30 of 65 positions (28.9% of the fund) are not held by OEF.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGUS | OEF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.1% | 38.9% |
| Communication Services | 10.2% | 13.5% |
| Financials | 9.4% | 11.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.2% | 10.2% |
| Industrials | 9.3% | 5.9% |
| Other Sectors | 21.0% | 20.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGUS, 0% of OEF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUS | +4.6% | +15.5% | +23.5% | +22.0% | — | — | 0.80% |
| OEF | +4.0% | +12.2% | +23.1% | +23.3% | +14.9% | +16.5% | 0.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGUS vs OEF →
Shared Holdings(35)
The top 10 shared positions account for 72% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AMZN.
6.85% | 10.50% | 6.85% | |
5.75% | 6.81% | 5.75% | |
5.04% | 5.04% | 5.04% | |
6.33% | 3.63% | 3.63% | |
3.22% | 4.15% | 3.22% | |
3.79% | 3.10% | 3.10% | |
2.75% | 9.23% | 2.75% | |
1.93% | 3.32% | 1.93% | |
3.92% | 1.81% | 1.81% | |
1.79% | 1.96% | 1.79% | |
1.82% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
1.30% | 1.01% | 1.01% | |
0.82% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
1.95% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.41% | 0.74% | 0.74% | |
2.57% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
0.67% | 1.26% | 0.67% | |
1.95% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
0.88% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
0.70% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.13% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
1.29% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
0.60% | 0.95% | 0.60% | |
1.34% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
0.49% | 0.51% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGUS and OEF overlap?
CGUS and OEF overlap by 49.7% of portfolio weight. They share 35 holdings (CGUS holds 65 positions and OEF holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGUS and OEF?
The two portfolios are 49.7% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGUS and OEF?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AMZN, AVGO and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 72% of the total overlap.
What does CGUS own that OEF doesn't?
30 positions (28.9% of CGUS) are unique to CGUS, led by TSM, STX and BATS. In the other direction, 66 positions (34.2% of OEF) are unique to OEF.