CGUS vs QQQ: Holdings Overlap
CGUSCapital Group Core Equity ETF
Capital Group · 65 holdings · $11.6B · as of 2026-05-31
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Invesco · 101 holdings · $479.2B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CGUS: 2026-05-31, QQQ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGUS and QQQ?
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS, by Capital Group) holds 65 positions; Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ, by Invesco) holds 101. They have 22 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 42.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 42.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 22CGUS holds 65 · QQQ holds 101
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGUS 53%·QQQ 53%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGUS
43 of 65 positions (43.6% of the fund) are not held by QQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGUS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.1% | 49.7% |
| Communication Services | 10.2% | 16.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.2% | 12.6% |
| Financials | 9.4% | 0.2% |
| Industrials | 9.3% | 4.2% |
| Other Sectors | 21.0% | 17.2% |
| Unclassified | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CGUS, 0% of QQQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGUS | +4.6% | +15.5% | +23.5% | +22.0% | — | — | 0.80% |
| QQQ | +1.9% | +18.0% | +27.6% | +25.2% | +15.2% | +20.8% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGUS vs QQQ →
Shared Holdings(22)
The top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AMZN.
6.85% | 8.68% | 6.85% | |
5.75% | 5.63% | 5.63% | |
5.04% | 4.58% | 4.58% | |
3.79% | 3.46% | 3.46% | |
3.22% | 3.43% | 3.22% | |
6.33% | 3.01% | 3.01% | |
2.75% | 7.63% | 2.75% | |
1.93% | 3.20% | 1.93% | |
1.95% | 1.73% | 1.73% | |
2.57% | 1.53% | 1.53% | |
1.30% | 2.30% | 1.30% | |
1.34% | 1.30% | 1.30% | |
0.70% | 0.81% | 0.70% | |
1.58% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
0.60% | 1.09% | 0.60% | |
1.71% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.49% | 1.25% | 0.49% | |
2.11% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
1.22% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.59% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
1.06% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.53% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGUS and QQQ overlap?
CGUS and QQQ overlap by 42.2% of portfolio weight. They share 22 holdings (CGUS holds 65 positions and QQQ holds 101), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGUS and QQQ?
The two portfolios are 42.2% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGUS and QQQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AMZN, META and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 82% of the total overlap.
What does CGUS own that QQQ doesn't?
43 positions (43.6% of CGUS) are unique to CGUS, led by LLY, TSM and RTX. In the other direction, 79 positions (47.2% of QQQ) are unique to QQQ.