CGXU vs SPEM: Holdings Overlap
CGXUCapital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Capital Group · 72 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
SPEMState Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 2776 holdings · $17.4B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (CGXU: 2026-05-31, SPEM: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGXU and SPEM?
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU, by Capital Group) holds 72 positions; State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 2776. They have 9 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 9CGXU holds 72 · SPEM holds 2776
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGXU 15%·SPEM 19%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGXU
63 of 72 positions (81.7% of the fund) are not held by SPEM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SPEM
2767 of 2776 positions (89.9% of the fund) are not held by CGXU. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGXU | SPEM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 20.3% | 25.3% |
| Industrials | 15.2% | 1.5% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 15.1% |
| Materials | 13.6% | 3.8% |
| Communication Services | 10.5% | 5.4% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 14.2% |
| Unclassified | 4.7% | 43.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of CGXU, 40% of SPEM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGXU | +2.8% | +19.2% | +34.7% | +16.5% | — | — | 4.84% |
| SPEM | +2.8% | +13.1% | +22.8% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +8.6% | 2.48% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGXU vs SPEM →
Shared Holdings(9)
The top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 700 and BHARTI.
6.83% | 14.02% | 6.83% | |
1.27% | 3.01% | 1.27% | |
1.20% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
1.15% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.81% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.43% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.64% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.78% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.48% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGXU and SPEM overlap?
CGXU and SPEM overlap by 10.1% of portfolio weight. They share 9 holdings (CGXU holds 72 positions and SPEM holds 2776), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGXU and SPEM?
The two portfolios are 10.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGXU and SPEM?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 700, BHARTI, NU and GMEXICOB. Together the top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CGXU own that SPEM doesn't?
63 positions (81.7% of CGXU) are unique to CGXU, led by 9984, FM and 000660. In the other direction, 2767 positions (89.9% of SPEM) are unique to SPEM.