CIBR vs DYNF: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
DYNFiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
iShares · 187 holdings · $38.6B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, DYNF: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and DYNF?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF, by iShares) holds 187. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8CIBR holds 42 · DYNF holds 187
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 38%·DYNF 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
34 of 42 positions (61.1% of the fund) are not held by DYNF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | DYNF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 39.3% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 16.1% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 11.6% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 8.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 7.6% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 16.2% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of DYNF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| DYNF | +4.0% | +15.6% | +25.9% | +25.0% | +15.5% | — | 0.77% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs DYNF →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by AVGO, CSCO and MSFT.
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 3.24% | 3.24% |
|---|---|---|---|
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 2.75% | 2.75% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 5.32% | 1.85% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 2.85% | 1.81% |
 IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. COM | 1.98% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc CL A | 8.25% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 LDOSLeidos Holdings Inc COM | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and DYNF overlap?
CIBR and DYNF overlap by 9.8% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and DYNF holds 187), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and DYNF?
The two portfolios are 9.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and DYNF?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, CSCO, MSFT, GOOGL and IBM. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that DYNF doesn't?
34 positions (61.1% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, NET and AKAM. In the other direction, 179 positions (85.2% of DYNF) are unique to DYNF.