CIBR vs ESGV: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
ESGVVanguard Esg U.S. Stock ETF
Vanguard · 1235 holdings · $13.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, ESGV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and ESGV?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; Vanguard Esg U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV, by Vanguard) holds 1235. They have 29 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 29CIBR holds 42 · ESGV holds 1235
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 84%·ESGV 16%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
13 of 42 positions (15.0% of the fund) are not held by ESGV.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | ESGV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 41.9% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 12.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 11.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 11.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 9.4% |
| Other Sectors | 6.5% | 12.9% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of ESGV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| ESGV | +3.6% | +13.9% | +23.4% | +21.2% | +11.9% | — | 0.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs ESGV →
Shared Holdings(29)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by AVGO, MSFT and GOOGL.
7.61% | 3.50% | 3.50% | |
1.85% | 5.66% | 1.85% | |
1.81% | 3.74% | 1.81% | |
7.67% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
8.46% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
8.25% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.81% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.87% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
7.40% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
2.07% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
4.71% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
2.03% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
3.08% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
3.68% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
2.70% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
2.27% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
3.65% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
2.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
3.18% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.42% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.04% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.71% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.99% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.65% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and ESGV overlap?
CIBR and ESGV overlap by 9.9% of portfolio weight. They share 29 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and ESGV holds 1235), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and ESGV?
The two portfolios are 9.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and ESGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, MSFT, GOOGL, CSCO and PANW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that ESGV doesn't?
13 positions (15.0% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by IBM, BAH and HO. In the other direction, 1206 positions (84.1% of ESGV) are unique to ESGV.