CIBR vs FTEC: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Fidelity · 282 holdings · $19.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, FTEC: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and FTEC?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC, by Fidelity) holds 282. They have 29 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 29CIBR holds 42 · FTEC holds 282
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 82%·FTEC 22%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
13 of 42 positions (17.1% of the fund) are not held by FTEC.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | FTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 99.2% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 0.1% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 0.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of FTEC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| FTEC | +6.4% | +29.3% | +41.1% | +31.8% | +19.5% | +24.4% | 0.35% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs FTEC →
Shared Holdings(29)
The top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the overlap, led by AVGO, MSFT and CSCO.
7.61% | 5.01% | 5.01% | |
1.85% | 9.53% | 1.85% | |
7.67% | 1.66% | 1.66% | |
1.98% | 0.99% | 0.99% | |
1.81% | 0.89% | 0.89% | |
8.46% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
8.25% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
1.87% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
4.71% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
7.40% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
2.07% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
2.03% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
3.08% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
3.68% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
2.70% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
2.02% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
3.65% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
2.27% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.42% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.99% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.74% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.00% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
1.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.71% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.65% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and FTEC overlap?
CIBR and FTEC overlap by 14.5% of portfolio weight. They share 29 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and FTEC holds 282), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and FTEC?
The two portfolios are 14.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and FTEC?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, MSFT, CSCO, IBM and ANET. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 88% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that FTEC doesn't?
13 positions (17.1% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by CHKP, BAH and HO. In the other direction, 253 positions (77.7% of FTEC) are unique to FTEC.