CIBR vs IGM: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
iShares · 288 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are CIBR and IGM?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM, by iShares) holds 288. They have 32 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 19.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 19.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 32CIBR holds 42 · IGM holds 288
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 85%·IGM 30%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
10 of 42 positions (14.6% of the fund) are not held by IGM.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | IGM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 82.6% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 17.1% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of IGM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| IGM | +4.5% | +26.9% | +40.7% | +35.3% | +19.1% | +23.9% | 0.13% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs IGM →
Shared Holdings(32)
The top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the overlap, led by AVGO, CSCO and MSFT.
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 8.16% | 7.61% |
|---|---|---|---|
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 2.02% | 2.02% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 8.23% | 1.85% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 4.65% | 1.81% |
 IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. COM | 1.98% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 0.85% | 0.85% |
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.84% |
 ACNAccenture PLC SHS CLASS A | 1.87% | 0.80% | 0.80% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 8.25% | 0.65% | 0.65% |
 NETCloudflare, Inc., Class A | 4.71% | 0.43% | 0.43% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
 AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc. COM | 3.68% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 OKTAOkta Inc. CL A | 2.70% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 DTDynatrace Inc COM NEW | 2.02% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 RBRKRubrik, Inc., Class A | 1.74% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 OTEXOpen Text Corp COM NPV | 1.26% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 ESTCElastic NV ORD SHS | 1.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 SSentinelOne, Inc., Class A | 0.99% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 FSLYFastly, Inc., Class A | 1.00% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 CVLTCommvault Systems Inc. COM | 0.71% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and IGM overlap?
CIBR and IGM overlap by 19.9% of portfolio weight. They share 32 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and IGM holds 288), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and IGM?
The two portfolios are 19.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and IGM?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, CSCO, MSFT, GOOGL and IBM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that IGM doesn't?
10 positions (14.6% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by CHKP, BAH and HO. In the other direction, 256 positions (70.2% of IGM) are unique to IGM.