CIBR vs IGV: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are CIBR and IGV?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18CIBR holds 42 · IGV holds 112
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 44%·IGV 25%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
24 of 42 positions (55.3% of the fund) are not held by IGV.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 90.6% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 8.2% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 0.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of IGV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs IGV →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by PANW, CRWD and FTNT.
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 5.48% | 5.48% |
|---|---|---|---|
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 8.25% | 4.21% | 4.21% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 2.21% | 2.21% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 8.36% | 1.85% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 1.66% | 1.66% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 0.61% | 0.61% |
 DTDynatrace Inc COM NEW | 2.02% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
 RBRKRubrik, Inc., Class A | 1.74% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
 OTEXOpen Text Corp COM NPV | 1.26% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
 ESTCElastic NV ORD SHS | 1.04% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 SSentinelOne, Inc., Class A | 0.99% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 CVLTCommvault Systems Inc. COM | 0.71% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 QLYSQualys Inc COM | 0.65% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
 VRNSVaronis Systems Inc COM | 0.55% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 TENBTenable Holdings Inc COM | 0.42% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 BBBlackBerry Ltd. COM | 0.49% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
 ATENA10 Networks Inc COM | 0.31% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and IGV overlap?
CIBR and IGV overlap by 18.5% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and IGV holds 112), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and IGV?
The two portfolios are 18.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and IGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are PANW, CRWD, FTNT, MSFT and DDOG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that IGV doesn't?
24 positions (55.3% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by CSCO, AVGO and NET. In the other direction, 94 positions (75.0% of IGV) are unique to IGV.