CIBR vs IJS: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
IJSiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
iShares · 458 holdings · $8.4B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are CIBR and IJS?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (IJS, by iShares) holds 458. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3CIBR holds 42 · IJS holds 458
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 1%·IJS 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
39 of 42 positions (98.3% of the fund) are not held by IJS. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | IJS |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 9.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 20.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 15.4% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 12.4% |
| Energy | 0.0% | 8.6% |
| Other Sectors | 2.1% | 30.7% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 1% of IJS).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| IJS | +3.6% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +13.6% | +8.2% | +10.2% | 1.29% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs IJS →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by ZD, NTCT and ATEN.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and IJS overlap?
CIBR and IJS overlap by 0.4% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and IJS holds 458), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and IJS?
The two portfolios are 0.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and IJS?
The largest positions held by both funds are ZD, NTCT and ATEN. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that IJS doesn't?
39 positions (98.3% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, CRWD and CSCO. In the other direction, 455 positions (98.2% of IJS) are unique to IJS.