CIBR vs IWP: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are CIBR and IWP?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277. They have 11 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 11CIBR holds 42 · IWP holds 277
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 25%·IWP 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
31 of 42 positions (74.3% of the fund) are not held by IWP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 15.6% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 24.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 21.2% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 14.9% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 2.1% | 15.3% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of IWP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs IWP →
Shared Holdings(11)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by NET, DDOG and ZS.
 NETCloudflare, Inc., Class A | 4.71% | 2.33% | 2.33% |
|---|---|---|---|
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 1.33% | 1.33% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
 DTDynatrace Inc COM NEW | 2.02% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
 BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. CL A | 1.92% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 0.29% | 0.29% |
 OKTAOkta Inc. CL A | 2.70% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
 ESTCElastic NV ORD SHS | 1.04% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
 RBRKRubrik, Inc., Class A | 1.74% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 SSentinelOne, Inc., Class A | 0.99% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and IWP overlap?
CIBR and IWP overlap by 5.8% of portfolio weight. They share 11 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and IWP holds 277), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and IWP?
The two portfolios are 5.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and IWP?
The largest positions held by both funds are NET, DDOG, ZS, DT and BAH. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that IWP doesn't?
31 positions (74.3% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, CRWD and CSCO. In the other direction, 266 positions (94.1% of IWP) are unique to IWP.