CIBR vs JQUA: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
JQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
JPMorgan · 289 holdings · $8.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, JQUA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and JQUA?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA, by JPMorgan) holds 289. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20CIBR holds 42 · JQUA holds 289
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 72%·JQUA 11%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
22 of 42 positions (27.5% of the fund) are not held by JQUA.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | JQUA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 37.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 10.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 2.1% | 21.6% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of JQUA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| JQUA | +3.6% | +18.6% | +24.4% | +19.8% | +13.4% | — | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs JQUA →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the overlap, led by AVGO, GOOGL and MSFT.
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 2.11% | 2.11% |
|---|---|---|---|
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 2.35% | 1.81% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 1.66% | 1.66% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 1.21% | 1.21% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 0.61% | 0.61% |
 ACNAccenture PLC SHS CLASS A | 1.87% | 0.41% | 0.41% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 8.25% | 0.40% | 0.40% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
 AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc. COM | 3.68% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 DTDynatrace Inc COM NEW | 2.02% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 OKTAOkta Inc. CL A | 2.70% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
 LDOSLeidos Holdings Inc COM | 1.74% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 RBRKRubrik, Inc., Class A | 1.74% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 SSentinelOne, Inc., Class A | 0.99% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 ESTCElastic NV ORD SHS | 1.04% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and JQUA overlap?
CIBR and JQUA overlap by 10.6% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and JQUA holds 289), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and JQUA?
The two portfolios are 10.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and JQUA?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, GOOGL, MSFT, CSCO and PANW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that JQUA doesn't?
22 positions (27.5% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by NET, CHKP and IBM. In the other direction, 269 positions (88.7% of JQUA) are unique to JQUA.