CIBR vs KOMP: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, KOMP: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and KOMP?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501. They have 24 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 24CIBR holds 42 · KOMP holds 501
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 74%·KOMP 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
18 of 42 positions (25.2% of the fund) are not held by KOMP.
Only in KOMP
477 of 501 positions (95.5% of the fund) are not held by CIBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 29.9% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 27.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 4.3% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 3.6% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 7.9% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 14.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 14% of KOMP).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs KOMP →
Shared Holdings(24)
The top 10 shared positions account for 57% of the overlap, led by LDOS, CSCO and PANW.
 LDOSLeidos Holdings Inc COM | 1.74% | 0.57% | 0.57% |
|---|---|---|---|
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 0.37% | 0.37% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 8.25% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 OKTAOkta Inc. Class A | 2.70% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 QLYSQualys Inc COM | 0.65% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 TENBTenable Holdings Inc COM | 0.42% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 RBRKRubrik, Inc., Class A | 1.74% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 VRNSVaronis Systems Inc COM | 0.55% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 SSentinelOne, Inc., Class A | 0.99% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 BBBlackBerry Ltd. COM | 0.49% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
 NETCloudflare, Inc., Class A | 4.71% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 CHKPCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. ORD | 3.18% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 NTCTNETSCOUT Systems Inc. COM | 0.47% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 ZDZiff Davis Inc COM | 0.32% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc. COM | 3.68% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 ATENA10 Networks Inc COM | 0.31% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and KOMP overlap?
CIBR and KOMP overlap by 4.4% of portfolio weight. They share 24 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and KOMP holds 501), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and KOMP?
The two portfolios are 4.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and KOMP?
The largest positions held by both funds are LDOS, CSCO, PANW, MSFT and CRWD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 57% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that KOMP doesn't?
18 positions (25.2% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by NTAP, DT and IBM. In the other direction, 477 positions (95.5% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP.