CIBR vs ONEQ: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Fidelity · 1022 holdings · $10.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, ONEQ: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and ONEQ?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ, by Fidelity) holds 1022. They have 26 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 11.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 11.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 26CIBR holds 42 · ONEQ holds 1022
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 74%·ONEQ 20%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
16 of 42 positions (25.7% of the fund) are not held by ONEQ.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 53.0% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 15.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 12.5% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 3.1% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 4.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 1.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 2% of ONEQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| ONEQ | +3.3% | +15.4% | +26.6% | +25.1% | +13.6% | +18.8% | 0.51% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs ONEQ →
Shared Holdings(26)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by AVGO, MSFT and GOOGL.
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 4.61% | 4.61% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 7.29% | 1.85% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 4.83% | 1.81% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 1.03% | 1.03% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 8.25% | 0.40% | 0.40% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc. COM | 3.68% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 OKTAOkta Inc. Class A | 2.70% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 CHKPCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. ORD | 3.18% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
 FROGJFrog Ltd ORD SHS | 1.42% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
 OTEXOpen Text Corp COM NPV | 1.26% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 SAICScience Applications International Corp. COM | 0.95% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 CVLTCommvault Systems Inc. COM | 0.71% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 VRNSVaronis Systems Inc COM | 0.55% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 TENBTenable Holdings Inc COM | 0.42% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 NTCTNETSCOUT Systems Inc. COM | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 QLYSQualys Inc COM | 0.65% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 ZDZiff Davis Inc COM | 0.32% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 FSLYFastly, Inc., Class A | 1.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and ONEQ overlap?
CIBR and ONEQ overlap by 11.1% of portfolio weight. They share 26 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and ONEQ holds 1022), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and ONEQ?
The two portfolios are 11.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and ONEQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, MSFT, GOOGL, CSCO and PANW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that ONEQ doesn't?
16 positions (25.7% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by NET, DT and IBM. In the other direction, 996 positions (80.0% of ONEQ) are unique to ONEQ.