CIBR vs QQEW: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
QQEWFirst Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF
First Trust · 51 holdings · $1.8B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are CIBR and QQEW?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW, by First Trust) holds 51. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8CIBR holds 42 · QQEW holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 41%·QQEW 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
34 of 42 positions (58.3% of the fund) are not held by QQEW. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in QQEW
43 of 51 positions (85.1% of the fund) are not held by CIBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | QQEW |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 49.6% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 16.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 12.4% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 10.0% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 7.7% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 3.9% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of QQEW).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| QQEW | +2.5% | +14.0% | +19.6% | +14.5% | +7.7% | +14.2% | 0.20% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs QQEW →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by FTNT, AVGO and PANW.
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 2.05% | 2.05% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 2.03% | 2.03% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc CL A | 8.25% | 1.95% | 1.95% |
 DDOGDatadog Inc CL A COM | 2.07% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 1.98% | 1.85% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 0.98% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and QQEW overlap?
CIBR and QQEW overlap by 14.7% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and QQEW holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and QQEW?
The two portfolios are 14.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and QQEW?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTNT, AVGO, PANW, CRWD and DDOG. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that QQEW doesn't?
34 positions (58.3% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by CSCO, NET and AKAM. In the other direction, 43 positions (85.1% of QQEW) are unique to QQEW.