CIBR vs QTEC: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
First Trust · 45 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are CIBR and QTEC?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC, by First Trust) holds 45. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 16.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 16.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8CIBR holds 42 · QTEC holds 45
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 41%·QTEC 17%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
34 of 42 positions (58.3% of the fund) are not held by QTEC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in QTEC
37 of 45 positions (83.2% of the fund) are not held by CIBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | QTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 86.5% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 6.5% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 2.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 4.7% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of QTEC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| QTEC | +1.7% | +37.5% | +49.6% | +28.1% | +14.1% | +21.4% | 0.01% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs QTEC →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by FTNT, AVGO and PANW.
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 2.32% | 2.32% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 2.31% | 2.31% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 2.28% | 2.28% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc CL A | 8.25% | 2.21% | 2.21% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 2.14% | 2.14% |
 DDOGDatadog Inc CL A COM | 2.07% | 2.19% | 2.07% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.85% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 1.11% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and QTEC overlap?
CIBR and QTEC overlap by 16.3% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and QTEC holds 45), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and QTEC?
The two portfolios are 16.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and QTEC?
The largest positions held by both funds are FTNT, AVGO, PANW, CRWD and ZS. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that QTEC doesn't?
34 positions (58.3% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by CSCO, NET and AKAM. In the other direction, 37 positions (83.2% of QTEC) are unique to QTEC.