CIBR vs QUAL: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
QUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
iShares · 121 holdings · $47.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, QUAL: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and QUAL?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL, by iShares) holds 121. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7CIBR holds 42 · QUAL holds 121
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 20%·QUAL 11%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
35 of 42 positions (79.6% of the fund) are not held by QUAL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | QUAL |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 34.4% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 11.6% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 11.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.8% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 9.4% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 23.6% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of QUAL).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| QUAL | +3.6% | +14.1% | +23.7% | +19.0% | +11.5% | +14.4% | 0.84% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs QUAL →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by MSFT, GOOGL and ANET.
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 5.04% | 1.85% |
|---|---|---|---|
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 2.53% | 1.81% |
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 1.81% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
 ACNAccenture PLC CLS'A'USD0.0000225 | 1.87% | 0.83% | 0.83% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.76% | 0.76% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and QUAL overlap?
CIBR and QUAL overlap by 7.0% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and QUAL holds 121), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and QUAL?
The two portfolios are 7.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and QUAL?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, GOOGL, ANET, ACN and FTNT. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that QUAL doesn't?
35 positions (79.6% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, CRWD and CSCO. In the other direction, 114 positions (88.9% of QUAL) are unique to QUAL.