CIBR vs RSPT: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Invesco · 73 holdings · $5.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, RSPT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and RSPT?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT, by Invesco) holds 73. They have 14 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 17.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 17.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 14CIBR holds 42 · RSPT holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 60%·RSPT 18%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
28 of 42 positions (39.4% of the fund) are not held by RSPT.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | RSPT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 98.7% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of RSPT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| RSPT | +5.6% | +42.3% | +59.3% | +30.5% | +17.0% | +21.3% | 0.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs RSPT →
Shared Holdings(14)
The top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the overlap, led by ANET, AVGO and CSCO.
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 1.81% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 1.45% | 1.45% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 1.39% | 1.39% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 1.35% | 1.35% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 1.33% | 1.33% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 1.29% | 1.29% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 1.23% | 1.23% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
 CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 8.25% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
 AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc. COM | 3.68% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
 IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. COM | 1.98% | 1.10% | 1.10% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 1.08% | 1.08% |
 ACNAccenture PLC SHS CLASS A | 1.87% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and RSPT overlap?
CIBR and RSPT overlap by 17.5% of portfolio weight. They share 14 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and RSPT holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and RSPT?
The two portfolios are 17.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and RSPT?
The largest positions held by both funds are ANET, AVGO, CSCO, NTAP and FFIV. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that RSPT doesn't?
28 positions (39.4% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by NET, ZS and CHKP. In the other direction, 59 positions (82.3% of RSPT) are unique to RSPT.