CIBR vs SPHQ: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
SPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Invesco · 99 holdings · $20.0B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, SPHQ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and SPHQ?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ, by Invesco) holds 99. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6CIBR holds 42 · SPHQ holds 99
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 24%·SPHQ 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
36 of 42 positions (75.6% of the fund) are not held by SPHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 27.6% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 24.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 15.3% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 13.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 2.1% | 10.6% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of SPHQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| SPHQ | -0.8% | +15.3% | +21.9% | +19.9% | +12.7% | +14.6% | 1.09% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs SPHQ →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CSCO, ACN and FTNT.
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 3.54% | 3.54% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ACNAccenture PLC SHS CLASS A | 1.87% | 1.04% | 1.04% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.85% | 0.85% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
 LDOSLeidos Holdings Inc COM | 1.74% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and SPHQ overlap?
CIBR and SPHQ overlap by 6.1% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and SPHQ holds 99), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and SPHQ?
The two portfolios are 6.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and SPHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are CSCO, ACN, FTNT, NTAP and LDOS. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that SPHQ doesn't?
36 positions (75.6% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, CRWD and AVGO. In the other direction, 93 positions (93.7% of SPHQ) are unique to SPHQ.