CIBR vs SUSA: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
SUSAiShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF
iShares · 170 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, SUSA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and SUSA?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF (SUSA, by iShares) holds 170. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13CIBR holds 42 · SUSA holds 170
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 49%·SUSA 14%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
29 of 42 positions (50.2% of the fund) are not held by SUSA.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | SUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 38.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 11.9% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 11.3% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 9.0% |
| Communication Services | 2.1% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 21.0% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of SUSA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| SUSA | +3.0% | +14.4% | +24.2% | +19.9% | +11.2% | +14.9% | 0.82% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs SUSA →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the overlap, led by AVGO, MSFT and GOOGL.
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 3.07% | 3.07% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 4.35% | 1.85% |
 GOOGLAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL A | 1.81% | 3.01% | 1.81% |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 0.67% | 0.67% |
 IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. COM | 1.98% | 0.66% | 0.66% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 0.66% | 0.66% |
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 1.81% | 0.52% | 0.52% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 ACNAccenture PLC CLS'A'USD0.0000225 | 1.87% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.03% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
 NETCloudflare, Inc., Class A | 4.71% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 ZSZscaler Inc COM | 3.65% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 OKTAOkta Inc. Class A | 2.70% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and SUSA overlap?
CIBR and SUSA overlap by 10.3% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and SUSA holds 170), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and SUSA?
The two portfolios are 10.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and SUSA?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, MSFT, GOOGL, CSCO and IBM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 97% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that SUSA doesn't?
29 positions (50.2% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by CRWD, FTNT and AKAM. In the other direction, 157 positions (85.8% of SUSA) are unique to SUSA.