CIBR vs USMV: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
USMViShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 170 holdings · $24.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, USMV: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and USMV?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV, by iShares) holds 170. They have 12 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 8.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 8.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 12CIBR holds 42 · USMV holds 170
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 54%·USMV 8%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
30 of 42 positions (45.1% of the fund) are not held by USMV.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | USMV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 29.2% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 13.7% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 12.7% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 9.9% |
| Utilities | 0.0% | 7.6% |
| Other Sectors | 8.7% | 26.6% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of USMV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| USMV | +2.3% | +7.6% | +10.3% | +12.2% | +7.4% | +9.9% | 1.44% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs USMV →
Shared Holdings(12)
The top 10 shared positions account for 98% of the overlap, led by CSCO, MSFT and IBM.
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. COM | 7.67% | 1.80% | 1.80% |
|---|---|---|---|
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.85% | 1.56% | 1.56% |
 IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. COM | 1.98% | 1.11% | 1.11% |
 ACNAccenture PLC CLS'A'USD0.0000225 | 1.87% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
 FFIVF5 Inc COM | 3.08% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 8.46% | 0.53% | 0.53% |
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 1.81% | 0.52% | 0.52% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 7.61% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 7.40% | 0.43% | 0.43% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 2.27% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 8.25% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 2.07% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and USMV overlap?
CIBR and USMV overlap by 8.2% of portfolio weight. They share 12 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and USMV holds 170), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and USMV?
The two portfolios are 8.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and USMV?
The largest positions held by both funds are CSCO, MSFT, IBM, ACN and FFIV. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 98% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that USMV doesn't?
30 positions (45.1% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by NET, AKAM and ZS. In the other direction, 158 positions (91.5% of USMV) are unique to USMV.