CIBR vs VTWO: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
VTWOVanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Vanguard · 1952 holdings · $17.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, VTWO: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and VTWO?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund (VTWO, by Vanguard) holds 1952. They have 8 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 8CIBR holds 42 · VTWO holds 1952
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 4%·VTWO 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
34 of 42 positions (95.0% of the fund) are not held by VTWO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VTWO
1944 of 1952 positions (98.9% of the fund) are not held by CIBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 17.8% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 19.4% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 15.5% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 14.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 7.3% |
| Other Sectors | 2.1% | 20.8% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 4.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 5% of VTWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| VTWO | +1.8% | +23.1% | +38.8% | +17.3% | +7.7% | +11.0% | 1.07% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs VTWO →
Shared Holdings(8)
The top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by CVLT, VRNS and QLYS.
 CVLTCommvault Systems Inc. COM | 0.71% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
|---|---|---|---|
 VRNSVaronis Systems Inc COM | 0.55% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 QLYSQualys Inc COM | 0.65% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 TENBTenable Holdings Inc COM | 0.42% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 NTCTNETSCOUT Systems Inc. COM | 0.47% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 FSLYFastly, Inc., Class A | 1.00% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
 ATENA10 Networks Inc COM | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
 ZDZiff Davis Inc COM | 0.32% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and VTWO overlap?
CIBR and VTWO overlap by 0.8% of portfolio weight. They share 8 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and VTWO holds 1952), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and VTWO?
The two portfolios are 0.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and VTWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are CVLT, VRNS, QLYS, TENB and NTCT. Together the top 8 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that VTWO doesn't?
34 positions (95.0% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, CRWD and CSCO. In the other direction, 1944 positions (98.9% of VTWO) are unique to VTWO.