CIBR vs XMHQ: Holdings Overlap
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
XMHQInvesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Invesco · 80 holdings · $5.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CIBR: 2026-03-31, XMHQ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CIBR and XMHQ?
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42 positions; Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ, by Invesco) holds 80. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1CIBR holds 42 · XMHQ holds 80
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CIBR 1%·XMHQ 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CIBR
41 of 42 positions (98.8% of the fund) are not held by XMHQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CIBR | XMHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 88.7% | 8.4% |
| Industrials | 6.5% | 28.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 19.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 15.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 2.1% | 18.8% |
| Unclassified | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (2% of CIBR, 0% of XMHQ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
| XMHQ | +4.3% | +16.0% | +18.7% | +14.6% | +10.6% | +13.0% | 0.55% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CIBR vs XMHQ →
Shared Holdings(1)
 QLYSQualys Inc COM | 0.65% | 0.41% | 0.41% |
|---|
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CIBR and XMHQ overlap?
CIBR and XMHQ overlap by 0.4% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (CIBR holds 42 positions and XMHQ holds 80), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CIBR and XMHQ?
The two portfolios are 0.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CIBR and XMHQ?
The largest positions held by both funds are QLYS. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CIBR own that XMHQ doesn't?
41 positions (98.8% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR, led by PANW, CRWD and CSCO. In the other direction, 79 positions (99.5% of XMHQ) are unique to XMHQ.