COWZ vs XLG: Holdings Overlap
COWZPacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 100 holdings · $18.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Invesco · 51 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are COWZ and XLG?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ, by Pacer) holds 100 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG, by Invesco) holds 51. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6COWZ holds 100 · XLG holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- COWZ 11%·XLG 2%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in COWZ
94 of 100 positions (89.3% of the fund) are not held by XLG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | COWZ | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 19.4% | 43.7% |
| Health Care | 21.0% | 7.0% |
| Communication Services | 8.1% | 17.0% |
| Energy | 16.4% | 2.7% |
| Industrials | 11.7% | 1.9% |
| Other Sectors | 23.3% | 27.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | +7.8% | +15.6% | +28.0% | +12.8% | +11.6% | — | 1.79% |
| XLG | +3.7% | +7.2% | +17.9% | +22.2% | +14.3% | +16.6% | 0.63% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in COWZ vs XLG →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by VZ, T and CRM.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do COWZ and XLG overlap?
COWZ and XLG overlap by 2.3% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (COWZ holds 100 positions and XLG holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both COWZ and XLG?
The two portfolios are 2.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of COWZ and XLG?
The largest positions held by both funds are VZ, T, CRM, ACN and INTU. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does COWZ own that XLG doesn't?
94 positions (89.3% of COWZ) are unique to COWZ, led by QCOM, MO and COP. In the other direction, 45 positions (97.2% of XLG) are unique to XLG.