CQQQ vs EEM: Holdings Overlap
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
Invesco · 173 holdings · $3.2B · as of 2026-04-30
EEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 1246 holdings · $30.2B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CQQQ: 2026-04-30, EEM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CQQQ and EEM?
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ, by Invesco) holds 173 positions; iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM, by iShares) holds 1246. They have 96 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 96CQQQ holds 173 · EEM holds 1246
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CQQQ 88%·EEM 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CQQQ
77 of 173 positions (11.9% of the fund) are not held by EEM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in EEM
1150 of 1246 positions (94.8% of the fund) are not held by CQQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CQQQ | EEM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 28.3% | 41.0% |
| Communication Services | 23.3% | 5.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 17.1% | 6.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.6% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 3.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 9.3% |
| Unclassified | 31.3% | 21.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of CQQQ, 22% of EEM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | -1.6% | +2.1% | +13.8% | +8.9% | -4.9% | +4.7% | 2.12% |
| EEM | -0.1% | +20.6% | +35.3% | +20.3% | +7.3% | +8.4% | 1.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CQQQ vs EEM →
Shared Holdings(96)
The top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the overlap, led by 700, PDD and 3690.
8.41% | 2.71% | 2.71% | |
8.48% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
8.59% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
6.85% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
3.63% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
4.28% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.91% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
2.59% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
2.50% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
2.58% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.58% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
1.52% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
2.20% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
1.39% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
2.98% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.67% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.75% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
1.10% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.72% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.75% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.85% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.71% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.59% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CQQQ and EEM overlap?
CQQQ and EEM overlap by 5.1% of portfolio weight. They share 96 holdings (CQQQ holds 173 positions and EEM holds 1246), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CQQQ and EEM?
The two portfolios are 5.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CQQQ and EEM?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, PDD, 3690, 9888 and 1347. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the total overlap.
What does CQQQ own that EEM doesn't?
77 positions (11.9% of CQQQ) are unique to CQQQ, led by 1888, 2577 and JOYY. In the other direction, 1150 positions (94.8% of EEM) are unique to EEM.