CQQQ vs ESGE: Holdings Overlap
CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF
Invesco · 173 holdings · $3.2B · as of 2026-04-30
ESGEiShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
iShares · 307 holdings · $6.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CQQQ: 2026-04-30, ESGE: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CQQQ and ESGE?
Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ, by Invesco) holds 173 positions; iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE, by iShares) holds 307. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13CQQQ holds 173 · ESGE holds 307
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CQQQ 45%·ESGE 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CQQQ
160 of 173 positions (54.4% of the fund) are not held by ESGE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in ESGE
294 of 307 positions (94.7% of the fund) are not held by CQQQ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CQQQ | ESGE |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 28.3% | 41.7% |
| Communication Services | 23.3% | 6.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 17.1% | 5.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 14.8% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 2.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 6.1% |
| Unclassified | 31.3% | 22.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of CQQQ, 22% of ESGE).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | -1.6% | +2.1% | +13.8% | +8.9% | -4.9% | +4.7% | 2.12% |
| ESGE | +0.1% | +20.1% | +34.1% | +20.5% | +7.1% | +9.1% | 2.15% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CQQQ vs ESGE →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 96% of the overlap, led by 700, 3690 and 9888.
8.41% | 2.64% | 2.64% | |
8.59% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
6.85% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.91% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
8.48% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.37% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.33% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
4.28% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.03% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.42% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.10% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
1.52% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
2.20% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CQQQ and ESGE overlap?
CQQQ and ESGE overlap by 4.3% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (CQQQ holds 173 positions and ESGE holds 307), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CQQQ and ESGE?
The two portfolios are 4.3% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CQQQ and ESGE?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 3690, 9888, 2382 and PDD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 96% of the total overlap.
What does CQQQ own that ESGE doesn't?
160 positions (54.4% of CQQQ) are unique to CQQQ, led by 1347, 9660 and 688256. In the other direction, 294 positions (94.7% of ESGE) are unique to ESGE.