DFAC vs IWV: Holdings Overlap
DFACDimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Dimensional · 2546 holdings · $47.9B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 2590 holdings · $20.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (DFAC: 2026-04-30, IWV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are DFAC and IWV?
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC, by Dimensional) holds 2546 positions; iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV, by iShares) holds 2590. They have 2083 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 74.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 74.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 2083DFAC holds 2546 · IWV holds 2590
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- DFAC 99%·IWV 96%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in DFAC
463 of 2546 positions (0.9% of the fund) are not held by IWV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | DFAC | IWV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 27.1% | 30.1% |
| Financials | 14.6% | 13.0% |
| Industrials | 13.6% | 10.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.2% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | 8.9% | 10.0% |
| Other Sectors | 24.9% | 26.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAC | +3.7% | +16.6% | +26.8% | +19.5% | +12.3% | — | 0.88% |
| IWV | +3.3% | +14.3% | +23.8% | +20.7% | +12.2% | +14.7% | 0.85% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in DFAC vs IWV →
Shared Holdings(2083)
The top 10 shared positions account for 35% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
5.60% | 6.50% | 5.60% | |
4.68% | 5.82% | 4.68% | |
3.92% | 4.37% | 3.92% | |
3.06% | 3.18% | 3.06% | |
2.14% | 2.66% | 2.14% | |
1.87% | 1.99% | 1.87% | |
1.69% | 2.16% | 1.69% | |
1.00% | 1.27% | 1.00% | |
0.95% | 2.27% | 0.95% | |
0.88% | 1.14% | 0.88% | |
0.87% | 1.17% | 0.87% | |
0.82% | 0.94% | 0.82% | |
0.71% | 1.41% | 0.71% | |
0.65% | 0.81% | 0.65% | |
0.71% | 0.60% | 0.60% | |
0.56% | 0.62% | 0.56% | |
0.50% | 0.54% | 0.50% | |
0.49% | 0.52% | 0.49% | |
0.48% | 0.64% | 0.48% | |
0.47% | 0.70% | 0.47% | |
0.46% | 0.49% | 0.46% | |
0.41% | 0.65% | 0.41% | |
0.40% | 0.61% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.47% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
Showing the top 250 of 2083 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do DFAC and IWV overlap?
DFAC and IWV overlap by 74.4% of portfolio weight. They share 2083 holdings (DFAC holds 2546 positions and IWV holds 2590), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both DFAC and IWV?
The two portfolios are 74.4% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of DFAC and IWV?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 35% of the total overlap.
What does DFAC own that IWV doesn't?
463 positions (0.9% of DFAC) are unique to DFAC, led by NXPI, STX and TEL. In the other direction, 507 positions (3.6% of IWV) are unique to IWV.