DGRO vs XLK: Holdings Overlap
DGROiShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
iShares · 394 holdings · $43.4B · as of 2026-04-30
XLKState Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 73 holdings · $122.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (DGRO: 2026-04-30, XLK: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are DGRO and XLK?
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO, by iShares) holds 394 positions; State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 73. They have 23 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 23DGRO holds 394 · XLK holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- DGRO 18%·XLK 49%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in DGRO
371 of 394 positions (81.5% of the fund) are not held by XLK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in XLK
50 of 73 positions (51.1% of the fund) are not held by DGRO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | DGRO | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 18.5% | 99.9% |
| Financials | 21.1% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 16.4% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 11.5% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 11.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 20.8% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGRO | +2.4% | +15.5% | +25.2% | +17.4% | +11.3% | +13.6% | 1.86% |
| XLK | +4.9% | +30.9% | +43.5% | +30.7% | +20.3% | +24.4% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in DGRO vs XLK →
Shared Holdings(23)
The top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the overlap, led by AVGO, AAPL and MSFT.
3.25% | 5.39% | 3.25% | |
2.93% | 12.41% | 2.93% | |
2.91% | 10.04% | 2.91% | |
1.73% | 3.15% | 1.73% | |
1.27% | 1.45% | 1.27% | |
1.10% | 1.12% | 1.10% | |
0.80% | 1.61% | 0.80% | |
0.76% | 0.69% | 0.69% | |
0.54% | 1.22% | 0.54% | |
0.38% | 2.77% | 0.38% | |
0.35% | 2.53% | 0.35% | |
0.31% | 0.39% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 1.39% | 0.29% | |
0.27% | 1.67% | 0.27% | |
0.31% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.24% | 0.59% | 0.24% | |
0.19% | 0.41% | 0.19% | |
0.17% | 0.52% | 0.17% | |
0.12% | 0.18% | 0.12% | |
0.10% | 0.25% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.44% | 0.10% | |
0.08% | 0.26% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.12% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do DGRO and XLK overlap?
DGRO and XLK overlap by 18.2% of portfolio weight. They share 23 holdings (DGRO holds 394 positions and XLK holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both DGRO and XLK?
The two portfolios are 18.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of DGRO and XLK?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, AAPL, MSFT, CSCO and IBM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 86% of the total overlap.
What does DGRO own that XLK doesn't?
371 positions (81.5% of DGRO) are unique to DGRO, led by JPM, XOM and JNJ. In the other direction, 50 positions (51.1% of XLK) are unique to XLK.