EEM vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap
EEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 1246 holdings · $30.2B · as of 2026-05-31
KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KraneShares · 31 holdings · $5.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EEM: 2026-05-31, KWEB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EEM and KWEB?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM, by iShares) holds 1246 positions; KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB, by KraneShares) holds 31. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21EEM holds 1246 · KWEB holds 31
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EEM 7%·KWEB 88%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EEM
1225 of 1246 positions (92.6% of the fund) are not held by KWEB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EEM | KWEB |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 41.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.8% | 39.5% |
| Communication Services | 5.3% | 29.3% |
| Financials | 12.6% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 0.6% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 12.0% | 7.6% |
| Unclassified | 21.6% | 19.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (22% of EEM, 19% of KWEB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEM | -0.1% | +20.6% | +35.3% | +20.3% | +7.3% | +8.4% | 1.70% |
| KWEB | +12.3% | -15.8% | -15.2% | +2.0% | -6.7% | +0.1% | 7.31% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EEM vs KWEB →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 96% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and PDD.
2.71% | 10.09% | 2.71% | |
2.08% | 8.93% | 2.08% | |
0.47% | 8.78% | 0.47% | |
0.38% | 7.36% | 0.38% | |
0.33% | 5.91% | 0.33% | |
0.29% | 4.28% | 0.29% | |
0.27% | 4.91% | 0.27% | |
0.23% | 3.56% | 0.23% | |
0.12% | 3.33% | 0.12% | |
0.09% | 4.34% | 0.09% | |
0.04% | 4.01% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 2.50% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 2.86% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 2.70% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 3.17% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 3.24% | 0.03% | |
0.02% | 1.82% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 2.23% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 1.90% | 0.02% | |
0.01% | 1.06% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 0.98% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EEM and KWEB overlap?
EEM and KWEB overlap by 7.3% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (EEM holds 1246 positions and KWEB holds 31), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EEM and KWEB?
The two portfolios are 7.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EEM and KWEB?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, PDD, 3690 and 9999. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 96% of the total overlap.
What does EEM own that KWEB doesn't?
1225 positions (92.6% of EEM) are unique to EEM, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 10 positions (11.9% of KWEB) are unique to KWEB.