EMXC vs ILF: Holdings Overlap
EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
iShares · 663 holdings · $23.8B · as of 2026-05-31
ILFiShares Latin America 40 ETF
iShares · 44 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EMXC: 2026-05-31, ILF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EMXC and ILF?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC, by iShares) holds 663 positions; iShares Latin America 40 ETF (ILF, by iShares) holds 44. They have 30 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 30EMXC holds 663 · ILF holds 44
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EMXC 4%·ILF 58%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EMXC
633 of 663 positions (96.2% of the fund) are not held by ILF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EMXC | ILF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.6% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 12.0% | 36.9% |
| Materials | 3.6% | 21.4% |
| Energy | 2.6% | 13.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 1.6% | 9.4% |
| Other Sectors | 10.7% | 17.6% |
| Unclassified | 19.8% | 1.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (20% of EMXC, 1% of ILF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | -2.1% | +31.1% | +51.2% | +24.8% | +11.5% | — | 2.03% |
| ILF | +2.7% | +15.2% | +38.5% | +14.3% | +10.7% | +7.1% | 3.41% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EMXC vs ILF →
Shared Holdings(30)
The top 10 shared positions account for 65% of the overlap, led by NU, GMEXICOB and GFNORTEO.
0.44% | 8.50% | 0.44% | |
0.38% | 5.16% | 0.38% | |
0.26% | 4.15% | 0.26% | |
0.23% | 3.57% | 0.23% | |
0.23% | 3.56% | 0.23% | |
0.20% | 2.89% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 2.69% | 0.20% | |
0.17% | 2.20% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 2.90% | 0.17% | |
0.15% | 2.43% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 2.43% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 2.24% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 2.23% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 1.60% | 0.12% | |
0.08% | 1.31% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.97% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 1.22% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 1.97% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 0.88% | 0.07% | |
0.05% | 1.17% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.69% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 0.71% | 0.04% | |
| Grupo Carso SAB de CV | 0.04% | 0.63% | 0.04% |
0.04% | 0.78% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 0.52% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EMXC and ILF overlap?
EMXC and ILF overlap by 3.7% of portfolio weight. They share 30 holdings (EMXC holds 663 positions and ILF holds 44), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EMXC and ILF?
The two portfolios are 3.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EMXC and ILF?
The largest positions held by both funds are NU, GMEXICOB, GFNORTEO, BAP and AMXB. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 65% of the total overlap.
What does EMXC own that ILF doesn't?
633 positions (96.2% of EMXC) are unique to EMXC, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 14 positions (41.0% of ILF) are unique to ILF.