EMXC vs LIT: Holdings Overlap
EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
iShares · 663 holdings · $23.8B · as of 2026-05-31
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (EMXC: 2026-05-31, LIT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EMXC and LIT?
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC, by iShares) holds 663 positions; Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3EMXC holds 663 · LIT holds 41
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EMXC 0%·LIT 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EMXC
660 of 663 positions (99.4% of the fund) are not held by LIT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in LIT
38 of 41 positions (88.3% of the fund) are not held by EMXC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EMXC | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.6% | 13.8% |
| Materials | 3.6% | 41.6% |
| Financials | 12.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.2% | 9.6% |
| Industrials | 3.0% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 8.7% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 19.8% | 26.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (20% of EMXC, 26% of LIT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | -2.1% | +31.1% | +51.2% | +24.8% | +11.5% | — | 2.03% |
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EMXC vs LIT →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 006400, 373220 and 247540.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EMXC and LIT overlap?
EMXC and LIT overlap by 0.5% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (EMXC holds 663 positions and LIT holds 41), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EMXC and LIT?
The two portfolios are 0.5% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EMXC and LIT?
The largest positions held by both funds are 006400, 373220 and 247540. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does EMXC own that LIT doesn't?
660 positions (99.4% of EMXC) are unique to EMXC, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 38 positions (88.3% of LIT) are unique to LIT.