ESGE vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap
ESGEiShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
iShares · 307 holdings · $6.8B · as of 2026-05-31
KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KraneShares · 31 holdings · $5.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ESGE: 2026-05-31, KWEB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ESGE and KWEB?
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE, by iShares) holds 307 positions; KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB, by KraneShares) holds 31. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 7.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 7.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18ESGE holds 307 · KWEB holds 31
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ESGE 7%·KWEB 83%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ESGE
289 of 307 positions (91.8% of the fund) are not held by KWEB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ESGE | KWEB |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 41.7% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 5.8% | 39.5% |
| Communication Services | 6.5% | 29.3% |
| Financials | 14.8% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 0.4% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Unclassified | 22.1% | 19.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (22% of ESGE, 19% of KWEB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGE | +0.1% | +20.1% | +34.1% | +20.5% | +7.1% | +9.1% | 2.15% |
| KWEB | +12.3% | -15.8% | -15.2% | +2.0% | -6.7% | +0.1% | 7.31% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ESGE vs KWEB →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and 9999.
2.64% | 10.09% | 2.64% | |
1.96% | 8.93% | 1.96% | |
0.43% | 5.91% | 0.43% | |
0.36% | 7.36% | 0.36% | |
0.34% | 4.91% | 0.34% | |
0.34% | 4.28% | 0.34% | |
0.18% | 3.56% | 0.18% | |
0.12% | 8.78% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 1.90% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 2.70% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 4.34% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 3.33% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 3.24% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 1.82% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 2.86% | 0.07% | |
0.07% | 2.23% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 4.01% | 0.06% | |
0.05% | 3.17% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ESGE and KWEB overlap?
ESGE and KWEB overlap by 7.2% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (ESGE holds 307 positions and KWEB holds 31), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ESGE and KWEB?
The two portfolios are 7.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ESGE and KWEB?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, 9999, 3690 and 9618. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the total overlap.
What does ESGE own that KWEB doesn't?
289 positions (91.8% of ESGE) are unique to ESGE, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 13 positions (16.5% of KWEB) are unique to KWEB.