ESGE vs MCHI: Holdings Overlap
ESGEiShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
iShares · 307 holdings · $6.8B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are ESGE and MCHI?
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE, by iShares) holds 307 positions; iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580. They have 89 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 89ESGE holds 307 · MCHI holds 580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ESGE 20%·MCHI 64%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ESGE
218 of 307 positions (78.5% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ESGE | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 41.7% | 7.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 5.8% | 21.1% |
| Communication Services | 6.5% | 17.2% |
| Financials | 14.8% | 14.8% |
| Energy | 1.6% | 2.6% |
| Other Sectors | 6.4% | 7.6% |
| Unclassified | 22.1% | 28.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (22% of ESGE, 29% of MCHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGE | +0.1% | +20.1% | +34.1% | +20.5% | +7.1% | +9.1% | 2.15% |
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ESGE vs MCHI →
Shared Holdings(89)
The top 10 shared positions account for 51% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and C6T.
2.64% | 13.21% | 2.64% | |
1.96% | 10.14% | 1.96% | |
1.21% | 3.97% | 1.21% | |
0.90% | 0.94% | 0.90% | |
0.63% | 1.96% | 0.63% | |
0.49% | 1.63% | 0.49% | |
0.49% | 2.35% | 0.49% | |
0.43% | 1.63% | 0.43% | |
0.41% | 2.10% | 0.41% | |
0.36% | 1.84% | 0.36% | |
0.34% | 1.31% | 0.34% | |
0.34% | 1.44% | 0.34% | |
0.29% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 0.60% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 0.90% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 0.57% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 0.32% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.34% | 0.24% | |
0.22% | 1.05% | 0.22% | |
0.21% | 0.39% | 0.21% | |
0.21% | 0.29% | 0.21% | |
0.20% | 0.36% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.64% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 0.60% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.21% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ESGE and MCHI overlap?
ESGE and MCHI overlap by 18.8% of portfolio weight. They share 89 holdings (ESGE holds 307 positions and MCHI holds 580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ESGE and MCHI?
The two portfolios are 18.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ESGE and MCHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, C6T, 992 and 2318RUB. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 51% of the total overlap.
What does ESGE own that MCHI doesn't?
218 positions (78.5% of ESGE) are unique to ESGE, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 491 positions (35.4% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI.