ESGV vs MTUM: Holdings Overlap
ESGVVanguard Esg U.S. Stock ETF
Vanguard · 1235 holdings · $13.1B · as of 2026-05-31
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ESGV: 2026-05-31, MTUM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ESGV and MTUM?
Vanguard Esg U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV, by Vanguard) holds 1235 positions; iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125. They have 82 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 28.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 28.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 82ESGV holds 1235 · MTUM holds 125
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ESGV 34%·MTUM 67%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ESGV
1153 of 1235 positions (65.7% of the fund) are not held by MTUM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ESGV | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 41.9% | 44.3% |
| Industrials | 4.7% | 15.6% |
| Communication Services | 12.2% | 7.4% |
| Financials | 11.6% | 10.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.5% | 3.6% |
| Other Sectors | 17.6% | 18.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGV | +3.6% | +13.9% | +23.4% | +21.2% | +11.9% | — | 0.84% |
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ESGV vs MTUM →
Shared Holdings(82)
The top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and GOOGL.
8.37% | 4.64% | 4.64% | |
3.50% | 5.40% | 3.50% | |
3.74% | 2.94% | 2.94% | |
3.02% | 2.39% | 2.39% | |
1.84% | 5.56% | 1.84% | |
1.41% | 4.03% | 1.41% | |
1.29% | 2.87% | 1.29% | |
0.86% | 3.83% | 0.86% | |
0.68% | 3.61% | 0.68% | |
0.60% | 2.36% | 0.60% | |
0.49% | 1.69% | 0.49% | |
0.43% | 1.61% | 0.43% | |
0.40% | 1.32% | 0.40% | |
0.35% | 1.13% | 0.35% | |
0.32% | 1.51% | 0.32% | |
0.31% | 1.54% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.90% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 1.03% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.82% | 0.28% | |
0.25% | 0.87% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 1.22% | 0.24% | |
0.24% | 1.04% | 0.24% | |
0.20% | 1.17% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.35% | 0.20% | |
0.16% | 0.88% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ESGV and MTUM overlap?
ESGV and MTUM overlap by 28.8% of portfolio weight. They share 82 holdings (ESGV holds 1235 positions and MTUM holds 125), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ESGV and MTUM?
The two portfolios are 28.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ESGV and MTUM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, GOOGL, GOOG and MU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the total overlap.
What does ESGV own that MTUM doesn't?
1153 positions (65.7% of ESGV) are unique to ESGV, led by AAPL, MSFT and AMZN. In the other direction, 43 positions (32.5% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM.