EZU vs CGBL: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 226 holdings · $9.8B · as of 2026-05-31
CGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETF
Capital Group · 73 holdings · $7.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (EZU: 2026-05-31, CGBL: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are EZU and CGBL?
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU, by iShares) holds 226 positions; Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL, by Capital Group) holds 73. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1EZU holds 226 · CGBL holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- EZU 2%·CGBL 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in EZU
225 of 226 positions (98.2% of the fund) are not held by CGBL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | EZU | CGBL |
|---|---|---|
| Financials | 23.5% | 9.0% |
| Industrials | 19.2% | 10.2% |
| Information Technology | 15.4% | 16.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.9% | 5.8% |
| Utilities | 6.4% | 0.7% |
| Other Sectors | 23.0% | 20.0% |
| Unclassified | 5.4% | 36.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of EZU, 37% of CGBL).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EZU | +4.0% | +13.7% | +23.6% | +19.3% | +10.3% | +10.8% | 2.57% |
| CGBL | +2.1% | +9.5% | +16.6% | — | — | — | 1.83% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in EZU vs CGBL →
Shared Holdings(1)
 SAFSafran SA | 1.63% | 0.57% | 0.57% |
|---|
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do EZU and CGBL overlap?
EZU and CGBL overlap by 0.6% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (EZU holds 226 positions and CGBL holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both EZU and CGBL?
The two portfolios are 0.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of EZU and CGBL?
The largest positions held by both funds are SAF. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does EZU own that CGBL doesn't?
225 positions (98.2% of EZU) are unique to EZU, led by ASML, SIE and SAP. In the other direction, 72 positions (97.5% of CGBL) are unique to CGBL.