FBCG vs IVV: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
iShares · 503 holdings · $901.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, IVV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and IVV?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV, by iShares) holds 503. They have 104 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 47.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 47.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 104FBCG holds 214 · IVV holds 503
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 85%·IVV 57%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
110 of 214 positions (15.2% of the fund) are not held by IVV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 32.6% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 10.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 9.8% |
| Financials | 2.1% | 12.6% |
| Health Care | 5.5% | 9.4% |
| Other Sectors | 9.2% | 24.8% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of IVV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| IVV | +3.4% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +21.3% | +13.4% | +15.4% | 1.05% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs IVV →
Shared Holdings(104)
The top 10 shared positions account for 72% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
14.58% | 7.56% | 7.56% | |
9.61% | 6.65% | 6.65% | |
5.19% | 4.91% | 4.91% | |
8.40% | 3.63% | 3.63% | |
9.08% | 2.99% | 2.99% | |
3.73% | 2.62% | 2.62% | |
3.89% | 2.23% | 2.23% | |
1.45% | 1.87% | 1.45% | |
2.25% | 1.30% | 1.30% | |
0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
2.22% | 0.72% | 0.72% | |
0.82% | 0.68% | 0.68% | |
0.49% | 0.45% | 0.45% | |
0.42% | 0.69% | 0.42% | |
0.82% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.39% | 0.53% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.60% | 0.37% | |
0.39% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.68% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.63% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.38% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.26% | 0.91% | 0.26% | |
0.58% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.48% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.23% | 0.45% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and IVV overlap?
FBCG and IVV overlap by 47.0% of portfolio weight. They share 104 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and IVV holds 503), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and IVV?
The two portfolios are 47.0% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and IVV?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 72% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that IVV doesn't?
110 positions (15.2% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by MRVL, TSM and CLS. In the other direction, 399 positions (42.7% of IVV) are unique to IVV.