FBCG vs VTI: Holdings Overlap
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Fidelity · 214 holdings · $6.9B · as of 2026-04-30
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Vanguard · 3505 holdings · $696.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FBCG: 2026-04-30, VTI: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FBCG and VTI?
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG, by Fidelity) holds 214 positions; Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTI, by Vanguard) holds 3505. They have 189 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 43.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 43.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 189FBCG holds 214 · VTI holds 3505
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FBCG 95%·VTI 52%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FBCG
25 of 214 positions (5.0% of the fund) are not held by VTI.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FBCG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 48.3% | 30.5% |
| Communication Services | 17.1% | 9.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 16.8% | 9.8% |
| Financials | 2.1% | 12.7% |
| Industrials | 6.1% | 10.4% |
| Other Sectors | 8.5% | 26.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.3% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FBCG, 0% of VTI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBCG | +2.6% | +14.4% | +23.8% | +27.2% | +13.5% | — | 0.04% |
| VTI | +3.3% | +14.6% | +24.2% | +20.9% | +12.3% | +14.9% | 1.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FBCG vs VTI →
Shared Holdings(189)
The top 10 shared positions account for 69% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
14.58% | 6.42% | 6.42% | |
9.61% | 5.94% | 5.94% | |
5.19% | 4.38% | 4.38% | |
8.40% | 3.21% | 3.21% | |
9.08% | 2.67% | 2.67% | |
3.73% | 2.34% | 2.34% | |
3.89% | 2.00% | 2.00% | |
1.45% | 1.67% | 1.45% | |
2.25% | 1.25% | 1.25% | |
2.22% | 0.65% | 0.65% | |
0.80% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.82% | 0.61% | 0.61% | |
0.42% | 0.61% | 0.42% | |
0.49% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.45% | 0.39% | |
0.82% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
0.37% | 0.51% | 0.37% | |
0.39% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.68% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.26% | 0.79% | 0.26% | |
0.63% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.38% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.23% | 0.38% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.94% | 0.22% | |
0.58% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FBCG and VTI overlap?
FBCG and VTI overlap by 43.8% of portfolio weight. They share 189 holdings (FBCG holds 214 positions and VTI holds 3505), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FBCG and VTI?
The two portfolios are 43.8% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FBCG and VTI?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 69% of the total overlap.
What does FBCG own that VTI doesn't?
25 positions (5.0% of FBCG) are unique to FBCG, led by TSM, CLS and SN. In the other direction, 3316 positions (47.4% of VTI) are unique to VTI.