FCOM vs IGV: Holdings Overlap
FCOMFidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF
Fidelity · 89 holdings · $1.7B · as of 2026-04-30
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (FCOM: 2026-04-30, IGV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FCOM and IGV?
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM, by Fidelity) holds 89 positions; iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 3.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 3.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3FCOM holds 89 · IGV holds 112
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FCOM 5%·IGV 4%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FCOM
86 of 89 positions (95.2% of the fund) are not held by IGV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FCOM | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 99.8% | 8.2% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 90.6% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | -1.3% | -2.9% | +8.4% | +20.2% | +6.1% | +10.5% | 0.99% |
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FCOM vs IGV →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by EA, TTWO and SNAP.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FCOM and IGV overlap?
FCOM and IGV overlap by 3.6% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (FCOM holds 89 positions and IGV holds 112), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FCOM and IGV?
The two portfolios are 3.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FCOM and IGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are EA, TTWO and SNAP. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does FCOM own that IGV doesn't?
86 positions (95.2% of FCOM) are unique to FCOM, led by META, GOOGL and GOOG. In the other direction, 109 positions (96.3% of IGV) are unique to IGV.