FDVV vs NOBL: Holdings Overlap
FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF
Fidelity · 96 holdings · $10.4B · as of 2026-04-30
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 69 holdings · $11.9B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FDVV: 2026-04-30, NOBL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FDVV and NOBL?
Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV, by Fidelity) holds 96 positions; ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL, by ProShares) holds 69. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 12.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 12.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13FDVV holds 96 · NOBL holds 69
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FDVV 14%·NOBL 19%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FDVV
83 of 96 positions (85.7% of the fund) are not held by NOBL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FDVV | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 26.7% | 3.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 11.3% | 23.5% |
| Industrials | 3.2% | 21.8% |
| Financials | 19.0% | 12.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.5% | 3.9% |
| Other Sectors | 24.9% | 34.8% |
| Unclassified | 1.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of FDVV, 0% of NOBL).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDVV | +3.8% | +15.1% | +22.8% | +19.9% | +14.6% | — | 2.69% |
| NOBL | +1.6% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +9.0% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FDVV vs NOBL →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the overlap, led by KO, PG and NEE.
 KOCoca-Cola Co (The) COM | 1.85% | 1.55% | 1.55% |
|---|---|---|---|
 PGProcter & Gamble Co. (The) | 1.80% | 1.48% | 1.48% |
 NEENextEra Energy Inc COM | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.38% |
 PEPPepsico Inc COM | 1.63% | 1.36% | 1.36% |
 MCDMcDonald's Corp. COM | 1.55% | 1.36% | 1.36% |
 LOWLowes Companies, Inc. COM | 1.38% | 1.25% | 1.25% |
 ESEversource Energy COM | 1.06% | 1.50% | 1.06% |
 IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. COM | 0.90% | 1.71% | 0.90% |
 ORealty Income Corporation COM | 0.90% | 1.40% | 0.90% |
 JNJJOHNSON and JOHNSON | 0.49% | 1.46% | 0.49% |
 CATCaterpillar Inc COM | 0.46% | 1.60% | 0.46% |
 ABBVAbbVie Inc. COM | 0.40% | 1.56% | 0.40% |
 ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. COM | 0.21% | 1.60% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FDVV and NOBL overlap?
FDVV and NOBL overlap by 12.8% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (FDVV holds 96 positions and NOBL holds 69), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FDVV and NOBL?
The two portfolios are 12.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FDVV and NOBL?
The largest positions held by both funds are KO, PG, NEE, PEP and MCD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 92% of the total overlap.
What does FDVV own that NOBL doesn't?
83 positions (85.7% of FDVV) are unique to FDVV, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 56 positions (80.5% of NOBL) are unique to NOBL.