FELG vs IWF: Holdings Overlap
FELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Fidelity · 100 holdings · $5.8B · as of 2026-03-31
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
iShares · 387 holdings · $127.3B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are FELG and IWF?
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG, by Fidelity) holds 100 positions; iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF, by iShares) holds 387. They have 71 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 75.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 75.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 71FELG holds 100 · IWF holds 387
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FELG 92%·IWF 81%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FELG
29 of 100 positions (6.7% of the fund) are not held by IWF.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FELG | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 51.1% | 49.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.4% | 13.1% |
| Communication Services | 12.6% | 12.4% |
| Industrials | 8.6% | 6.7% |
| Health Care | 8.1% | 8.0% |
| Other Sectors | 7.2% | 10.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FELG | +3.4% | +7.3% | +16.4% | — | — | — | 0.34% |
| IWF | +2.7% | +5.5% | +13.1% | +22.0% | +12.6% | +17.8% | 0.35% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FELG vs IWF →
Shared Holdings(71)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
13.29% | 12.92% | 12.92% | |
12.03% | 11.64% | 11.64% | |
8.19% | 8.82% | 8.19% | |
5.23% | 4.79% | 4.79% | |
4.22% | 4.66% | 4.22% | |
3.83% | 3.55% | 3.55% | |
3.61% | 3.54% | 3.54% | |
3.93% | 3.46% | 3.46% | |
3.22% | 2.87% | 2.87% | |
2.91% | 2.66% | 2.66% | |
1.98% | 1.45% | 1.45% | |
1.92% | 1.39% | 1.39% | |
1.32% | 1.84% | 1.32% | |
1.55% | 1.06% | 1.06% | |
1.05% | 1.60% | 1.05% | |
1.48% | 0.97% | 0.97% | |
0.95% | 1.47% | 0.95% | |
0.78% | 1.15% | 0.78% | |
0.78% | 0.90% | 0.78% | |
0.64% | 0.85% | 0.64% | |
1.07% | 0.56% | 0.56% | |
1.06% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.65% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.40% | 0.70% | 0.40% | |
0.53% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FELG and IWF overlap?
FELG and IWF overlap by 75.5% of portfolio weight. They share 71 holdings (FELG holds 100 positions and IWF holds 387), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FELG and IWF?
The two portfolios are 75.5% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FELG and IWF?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO and AMZN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does FELG own that IWF doesn't?
29 positions (6.7% of FELG) are unique to FELG, led by ZM, FTI and EA. In the other direction, 316 positions (18.4% of IWF) are unique to IWF.