FNDC vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap
FNDCSchwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Schwab · 1580 holdings · $3.1B · as of 2026-05-31
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (FNDC: 2026-05-31, GDXJ: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDC and GDXJ?
Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC, by Schwab) holds 1580 positions; VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 1.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 1.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21FNDC holds 1580 · GDXJ holds 114
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDC 2%·GDXJ 48%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDC
1559 of 1580 positions (97.6% of the fund) are not held by GDXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | +4.3% | +15.1% | +22.5% | +18.2% | +8.5% | +9.0% | 3.53% |
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDC vs GDXJ →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the overlap, led by SSRM, EVN and CGAU.
0.18% | 1.38% | 0.18% | |
0.15% | 6.01% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.92% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 6.05% | 0.13% | |
0.10% | 2.37% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 7.13% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.99% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 1.90% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 1.58% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 6.64% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 1.57% | 0.09% | |
0.07% | 0.96% | 0.07% | |
0.06% | 0.72% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 2.82% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.71% | 0.06% | |
0.05% | 1.04% | 0.05% | |
0.04% | 1.24% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 1.23% | 0.03% | |
0.01% | 0.40% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 0.52% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 2.26% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDC and GDXJ overlap?
FNDC and GDXJ overlap by 1.7% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (FNDC holds 1580 positions and GDXJ holds 114), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDC and GDXJ?
The two portfolios are 1.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDC and GDXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are SSRM, EVN, CGAU, EDV and IAG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the total overlap.
What does FNDC own that GDXJ doesn't?
1559 positions (97.6% of FNDC) are unique to FNDC, led by 4062, 047040 and TSEMIL-S. In the other direction, 93 positions (51.7% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ.