FNDC vs IMTM: Holdings Overlap
FNDCSchwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Schwab · 1580 holdings · $3.1B · as of 2026-05-31
IMTMiShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 313 holdings · $4.2B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FNDC: 2026-05-31, IMTM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FNDC and IMTM?
Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC, by Schwab) holds 1580 positions; iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM, by iShares) holds 313. They have 57 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 57FNDC holds 1580 · IMTM holds 313
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FNDC 8%·IMTM 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FNDC
1523 of 1580 positions (91.6% of the fund) are not held by IMTM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | +4.3% | +15.1% | +22.5% | +18.2% | +8.5% | +9.0% | 3.53% |
| IMTM | +2.7% | +12.9% | +21.7% | +21.3% | +10.1% | +10.4% | 4.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FNDC vs IMTM →
Shared Holdings(57)
The top 10 shared positions account for 37% of the overlap, led by CLS, TSEMIL-S and PAAS.
0.28% | 0.62% | 0.28% | |
0.44% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.19% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.22% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.69% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.19% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.20% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.22% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.30% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.15% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.20% | 0.13% | |
0.15% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.33% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.59% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.14% | 0.11% | |
0.16% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.12% | 0.11% | |
0.13% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.15% | 0.10% | |
0.10% | 0.28% | 0.10% | |
0.19% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.15% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.09% | 0.18% | 0.09% | |
0.14% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
0.12% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FNDC and IMTM overlap?
FNDC and IMTM overlap by 4.8% of portfolio weight. They share 57 holdings (FNDC holds 1580 positions and IMTM holds 313), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FNDC and IMTM?
The two portfolios are 4.8% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FNDC and IMTM?
The largest positions held by both funds are CLS, TSEMIL-S, PAAS, HBAN and 4062. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 37% of the total overlap.
What does FNDC own that IMTM doesn't?
1523 positions (91.6% of FNDC) are unique to FNDC, led by 047040, 032830 and 006260. In the other direction, 256 positions (92.0% of IMTM) are unique to IMTM.