FTCS vs NOBL: Holdings Overlap
FTCSFirst Trust Capital Strength ETF
First Trust · 50 holdings · $7.9B · as of 2026-03-31
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 69 holdings · $11.9B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (FTCS: 2026-03-31, NOBL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FTCS and NOBL?
First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS, by First Trust) holds 50 positions; ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL, by ProShares) holds 69. They have 16 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 16FTCS holds 50 · NOBL holds 69
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FTCS 33%·NOBL 24%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FTCS
34 of 50 positions (67.3% of the fund) are not held by NOBL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FTCS | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Staples | 17.0% | 23.5% |
| Financials | 23.0% | 12.7% |
| Industrials | 21.5% | 21.8% |
| Health Care | 12.1% | 10.2% |
| Materials | 6.3% | 11.5% |
| Other Sectors | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTCS | +2.7% | +8.9% | +11.0% | +10.9% | +6.3% | +10.8% | 1.06% |
| NOBL | +1.6% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +9.0% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FTCS vs NOBL →
Shared Holdings(16)
The top 10 shared positions account for 65% of the overlap, led by CL, ADP and GD.
2.09% | 1.61% | 1.61% | |
1.61% | 1.60% | 1.60% | |
1.93% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
2.10% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
2.23% | 1.55% | 1.55% | |
1.75% | 1.55% | 1.55% | |
2.01% | 1.49% | 1.49% | |
2.07% | 1.48% | 1.48% | |
2.34% | 1.47% | 1.47% | |
2.31% | 1.46% | 1.46% | |
2.07% | 1.42% | 1.42% | |
2.09% | 1.41% | 1.41% | |
1.99% | 1.39% | 1.39% | |
2.20% | 1.36% | 1.36% | |
1.74% | 1.35% | 1.35% | |
2.15% | 1.31% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FTCS and NOBL overlap?
FTCS and NOBL overlap by 23.6% of portfolio weight. They share 16 holdings (FTCS holds 50 positions and NOBL holds 69), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FTCS and NOBL?
The two portfolios are 23.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FTCS and NOBL?
The largest positions held by both funds are CL, ADP, GD, ABBV and KO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 65% of the total overlap.
What does FTCS own that NOBL doesn't?
34 positions (67.3% of FTCS) are unique to FTCS, led by EOG, ROST and GILD. In the other direction, 53 positions (76.1% of NOBL) are unique to NOBL.