FXI vs IEMG: Holdings Overlap
FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF
iShares · 52 holdings · $4.3B · as of 2026-04-30
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (FXI: 2026-04-30, IEMG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are FXI and IEMG?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI, by iShares) holds 52 positions; iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697. They have 49 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 49FXI holds 52 · IEMG holds 2697
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- FXI 100%·IEMG 11%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in FXI
3 of 52 positions (0.3% of the fund) are not held by IEMG.
Only in IEMG
2648 of 2697 positions (89.0% of the fund) are not held by FXI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | FXI | IEMG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 5.4% | 36.2% |
| Financials | 31.0% | 11.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 25.4% | 6.0% |
| Communication Services | 15.4% | 4.6% |
| Energy | 5.6% | 2.3% |
| Other Sectors | 8.8% | 9.0% |
| Unclassified | 8.3% | 30.7% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (8% of FXI, 31% of IEMG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXI | +11.3% | -4.8% | -2.4% | +10.4% | +0.1% | +2.5% | 1.88% |
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in FXI vs IEMG →
Shared Holdings(49)
The top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and C6T.
7.72% | 2.37% | 2.37% | |
8.66% | 1.82% | 1.82% | |
8.25% | 0.71% | 0.71% | |
5.41% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
6.02% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
4.41% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
4.79% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
3.72% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
4.09% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
3.56% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
2.83% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
3.00% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
2.68% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
2.69% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
2.30% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
2.32% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
1.92% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
2.00% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.75% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
1.49% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.99% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.31% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.01% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.04% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.12% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do FXI and IEMG overlap?
FXI and IEMG overlap by 10.7% of portfolio weight. They share 49 holdings (FXI holds 52 positions and IEMG holds 2697), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both FXI and IEMG?
The two portfolios are 10.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of FXI and IEMG?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, C6T, 1810 and ICK. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 68% of the total overlap.
What does FXI own that IEMG doesn't?
3 positions (0.3% of FXI) are unique to FXI, led by 0BO, C0V and 2NM0. In the other direction, 2648 positions (89.0% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG.