GDXJ vs SCHE: Holdings Overlap
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VanEck · 114 holdings · $7.3B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHESchwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Schwab · 2180 holdings · $12.7B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (GDXJ: 2026-03-31, SCHE: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are GDXJ and SCHE?
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ, by VanEck) holds 114 positions; Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE, by Schwab) holds 2180. They have 5 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 5GDXJ holds 114 · SCHE holds 2180
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- GDXJ 5%·SCHE 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in GDXJ
109 of 114 positions (95.1% of the fund) are not held by SCHE. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SCHE
2175 of 2180 positions (99.5% of the fund) are not held by GDXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | GDXJ | SCHE |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 84.2% | 3.7% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 29.1% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 13.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 7.0% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 5.9% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 9.7% |
| Unclassified | 16.0% | 30.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (16% of GDXJ, 31% of SCHE).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | +18.9% | +3.4% | +66.3% | +52.0% | +23.9% | +10.8% | 2.25% |
| SCHE | +3.4% | +13.1% | +22.4% | +17.1% | +6.7% | +8.0% | 2.57% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in GDXJ vs SCHE →
Shared Holdings(5)
The top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by 4FO, ZVL and Chifeng Jilong Gold Mining Group Ltd.
2.41% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
2.00% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
| Chifeng Jilong Gold Mining Group Ltd | 0.28% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
0.27% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
| TR Anadolu Metal Madencilik Isletmeleri AS | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do GDXJ and SCHE overlap?
GDXJ and SCHE overlap by 0.2% of portfolio weight. They share 5 holdings (GDXJ holds 114 positions and SCHE holds 2180), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both GDXJ and SCHE?
The two portfolios are 0.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of GDXJ and SCHE?
The largest positions held by both funds are 4FO, ZVL, Chifeng Jilong Gold Mining Group Ltd, TRALT and TR Anadolu Metal Madencilik Isletmeleri AS. Together the top 5 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does GDXJ own that SCHE doesn't?
109 positions (95.1% of GDXJ) are unique to GDXJ, led by AGI, CDE and EQX. In the other direction, 2175 positions (99.5% of SCHE) are unique to SCHE.